Click for Coverage
Due to the EU’s Global Data Protection Regulation, our website is currently unavailable to visitors from most European countries. We apologize for this inconvenience and encourage you to visit for the latest on new cars, car reviews and news, concept cars and auto show coverage, awards and much more.MOTORTREND.COM
  • JP Magazine
  • Dirt Sports + Off-Road
  • 4-Wheel & Off-Road
  • Four Wheeler

Trail’s End: April 2001, We Drive The New IRS Ford Explorer

Posted in Features on April 19, 2016
Share this

The all-new third-gen Ford Explorer debuted as a ’02 model, and we trotted out a First Look at the SUV in the Apr. ’01 issue of Four Wheeler. This new Explorer was a significant change from its predecessor. It continued to be a body-on-frame design with independent front suspension (IFS), but the body of the five-door was 2 1/2 inches wider overall, the vehicle had a 2-inch-longer wheelbase and an independent rear suspension (IRS). The change from solid axle and leaf springs to IRS was a first for Explorer, and it allowed Ford engineers to integrate a third-row seat (also a first for Explorer) that folded flat to the floor when cargo space was needed.

Two engines were available: a 4.0L V-6 that made 210 hp and 250 lb-ft of torque or a 4.6L V-8 that made 240 hp and 280 lb-ft of torque. Interestingly, the V-6 could be paired with a five-speed manual transmission. The V-8 engine was mated to a five-speed automatic that was “sealed from the factory with 11 quarts of a semi-synthetic blend of transmission fluid that should not require service for the first 150,000 miles,” we were told.

The four-wheel-drive system was “refined” for the ’02 Explorer in the sense that the Control Trac system was given its own dedicated electronic controller, which was designed to do a better job of managing the four-wheel-drive system when in 4x4 Auto mode. The ’02 Explorer was fit with a two-speed transfer case with 2.48:1 low range ratio.

We wrote that the Explorer was quieter on the inside than its predecessor and the extra 2 1/2 inches of width gave it a more open feel. When it came to driving impressions we wrote, “Our off-road expedition consisted of a snowy and muddy road that the Explorer handled fairly easily. It did a good job of finding traction and motored up most obstacles. However, the trail did not test the articulation of the Explorer, which we suspect is limited. While the off-roading was easy, it was probably the most trail work any sane person would do with a brand-new SUV.” We also wrote that we weren’t sold on the Explorer’s IRS due in part to a lack of wheel travel.

The ’16 Explorer is now in its fifth-generation of production, and it’s dramatically different than previous generations of Explorer. It uses a unibody structure and available all-wheel drive (no two-speed T-case). However, Ford’s website says “When the pavement ends, the adventure begins,” when referring to the Explorer, which indicates that the vehicle is being marketed as a capable on- and off-road vehicle. An example of this is the Explorer’s available Hill Control and Terrain Management System.

Over the years we’ve had some great off-roading trips in first and second-generation Explorers. Soon, we’re getting seat time in the ’16 Explorer and we’ll report back, good or bad, on Ford’s newest version of the storied Explorer nameplate.

Connect With Us

Newsletter Sign Up

Subscribe to the Magazine

Browse Articles By Vehicle

See Results