Four Wheeler Magazine covers 4x4 Trucks, SUVs, & Off Road Vehicles
Subscribe Four Wheeler Magazine today for only $10.00! Link to Four Wheeler Magazine Facebook Fan Page Sign up today at Four Wheeler for your personal car space

Massive Multi-Winch Shootout

Eight Winches, Ten Tests, One Winner

By Robin Stover, Photography by Robin Stover
Multi Winch Shootout Test Winches

Getting unstuck while four wheeling is a rite of passage everyone must experience to be considered a trail veteran. Whether mired in deep mud or wedged between two rocks, the vehicle extraction process can induce feelings of frustration, humility, and even desperation. However, even in the worst stuck scenario, one can avoid all of those displeasures by deploying the pulling power of a trusty winch. No 4x4 is complete without one, and no other mechanical contraption comes close to accomplishing the job a winch is designed for.

Historically, winches were considered implements of necessity, rarely used by the average person, and the last thing anybody would associate with vehicular mobility. However, that all changed in 1945 when brothers Claude and Rayburn Ramsey of Ramsey Tool and Die Company figured out how to package their Model 101 winch, a shaft-powered unit, to the front of World War II-era Jeeps. The concept was simple and effective, allowing drivers the ability to self-extract a stuck vehicle from snow and mud with a one-direction pull. Fast forward some 70 years, and winching technology has come a long way. Millions own and operate winches regularly, and they come in hundreds of configurations and intended uses. However, not all were created equal, and consumers must face the task of figuring out what specific type and size is best for their 4x4. Generally, we recommend picking a winch that is capable of pulling one and a half times the weight of the vehicle it’s mounted to. This allows a margin of safety for the winch and operator, plus it ensures capability as each additional layer of cable is spooled to the drum.

Among the most popular class of electric winches, are those that are rated between 8,000 and 9,500 pounds—perfect for popular midsize vehicles such as pickups, Jeeps, and Blazers. We set out to evaluate a group of eight to see which model was the most recommendable. Our goal is to provide you with the most comprehensive information available to simplify the task of winch selection. As such, we developed an arsenal of tests that would push each unit well beyond the manufacturers’ recommendations and specifications. Think of this shootout as the Top Truck Challenge of winches.

The Players (in alphabetical order)
Bulldog Alpha 9300 (9,300-lb electric)
Engo E9000 (9,000-lb electric)
Harbor Freight Badland 9000 (9,000-lb electric)
Kodiak Bruin (9,500-lb electric)
Summit Racing SUM-930002 (9,000-lb electric)
Superwinch EP9.0 (9,500-lb electric)
T-Max EWI9500 (9,500-lb electric)
Warn 9.5xp (9,500-lb electric)

(Editor’s note: Mile Marker and Ramsey were also invited to submit winches for this shootout; both declined our invitation.)

The Testing
Each unit would be scored on the following ten categories:
1. Packaging (Was unit adequately protected for shipping?)
2. Exterior labeling (Are visual warnings easy to comprehend?)
3. Instructions (Content, clarity, pictures, and detail)
4. Power-to-weight ratio (Actual stall weight vs. weight as tested)
5. Ease of use (Clutch engagement, plug quality, remote control feel and function)
6. Noise during operation (decibel level @ no load)
7. Submersion (How does water effect operation?)
8. Power wire quality (Strand count, size, coloring, insulation)
9. Speed and efficiency (How fast and how far?)
10. Stall test (Where do they stop pulling?)

Multi Winch Shootout Winch Mount

Multi-Mounts for All
We picked Warn to supply the Multi-Mounts because they are manufactured in the U.S., and come fully assembled with electrical pigtails that make wiring hookup a snap. The Warn units feature robust construction that virtually eliminates the possibility of deflection. The unit shown here is rated for a 9,500-pound winch and weighs just over 23 pounds fully assembled.

Multi Winch Shootout Optima Batteries

Our Power Source
We assigned a brand new, fully charged, deep-cycle, BlueTop Optima battery to each winch. While the Optima BlueTop is offered in both a deep-cycle and a starting version, we chose the deep-cycle version because it supplies 750 cold cranking amps and features a 120-minute reserve capacity, which helps it handle hundreds of deep discharges without cutting into the lifespan of the battery—perfect for heavy winching scenarios.

Multi Winch Shootout Synthetic Superline

Safe and Sound
In the effort to keep ourselves safe, and to ensure apples-to-apples evaluations, we installed a 100-foot length of 5⁄16-inch Master-Pull synthetic Superline. This rope has a 21,000-pound rating and would ensure the safety of our staff. Superline installs in place of the standard steel wire cable supplied by most manufacturers. Next, while spooling in the rope on the drum of each winch, we used a decimal meter to see how much noise each unit produced while operating at no load. Sound levels varied significantly between the different units, and where you might associate quietness with quality, the next part of our test would prove otherwise.

Noise Level As Tested
Brand dB level (no load)
Bulldog 80
Engo 83
Harbor Freight N/A
Kodiak 79
Summit Racing N/A
Superwinch 90
T-Max 79
Warn 81

Multi Winch Shootout Winch Packing

Packaging
As each of the ten winches arrived at our test facility, we took notes on how each brand prepared the unit for shipping. Winches are heavy objects, and proper packaging techniques can make the difference between the unit working as intended or filing a damage claim. We were surprised with how well thought-out some of the packages were, while others arrived with damaged boxes and jumbled contents.

Multi Winch Shootout Winch Wiegh In

Weigh-In
Prior to operation, each winch was inspected for anomalies. Next, each unit was weighed with and without cable to see how manufacturing variances affected overall mass. With each unit’s weight recorded, we then mounted each unit to a Warn multi-mount cradle for ease of transport and testing. Some modifications were necessary to allow some of the winches to bolt up to the Warn Multi-Mounts, but with a little drilling and grinding, we were able to make each winch fit.

Winch Weight (without cable)
Brand Weight As Tested (lb)
Bulldog 50.9
Engo 49.4
Harbor Freight 52 Kodiak 56.7
Summit Racing 68.5
Superwinch 62.8
T-Max 54
Warn 53.9

Multi Winch Shootout Submerssion Test

Submersion Test
Submergibility is a factor we believe is paramount to a trusty winch. As such, we wanted to test each unit under water to see if any ill effects would surface during and after a dunking. To do so, each winch was connected to its corresponding Optima battery to power out the drum of steel cable. This would allow each drum to spin freely with no interference. Much to our surprise—two of the units did not work right out of the box, the Summit and Harbor Freight models—requiring us to retire them from the competition. Next, we lowered each winch into a large stainless-steel water tank, one at a time, and ran each continuously, at no load, for a period of ten minutes. We took notes on the amount of air bubbles that came from each unit and we took notes on changes in both sound and water color. Most of the units tested emerged unscathed from the bath, but one model, the Kodiak Bruin, would no longer spool in or out after the test.

Results
Brand Observations
Bulldog No ill effects
Engo No ill effects
Harbor Freight Failed prior to test
Kodiak No ill effects during test, failed to operate afterward
Summit Racing Failed prior to test
Superwinch No ill effects
T-Max Made unusual sounds during first two minutes of test
Warn Contaminated water with bronze-colored substance

By Robin Stover
Enjoyed this Post? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, or use your favorite social media to recommend us to friends and colleagues!

*Please enter your username

*Please enter your password

*Please enter your comments
Comments:
Not Registered?Signup Here
(1024 character limit)
timekpr1
In conclusion, while all of the winches in this test have strengths that distinguish them, the Warn 9.5xp is the most recommendable winch of the group we tested.

I am sure the copy boy made a mistake.  No one could had written this story in good conscience.
TheTJRod
Hahahaha... oh your serious. Did a little calculating. Divide the subjective data by 3 and multiply the emperical data by 3. They way it should be. The give the stall test failures half possible score like in the water test and you got the winners(By an even larger amount if you give them a 0 for breaking). T-max and Engo. Adding a price score, with 10 for cheapest and 0 for most still nets Warn a winner in the crap data we don't care about.
abwillingham
Is this article a joke?  You assigned 60 points to the remote control function and a combined 60 points for all the performance tests combined?  The performance tests made up only 24% of the total score while the "empirical" fluff tests made up 76%?  You gave three times the weight to "external labeling" than you did to the stall or water tests?  Seriously?  Good to know that even though I'm stuck out in the middle of nowhere with a busted winch, I've got awesome labeling to read while I wait for a rescue. You guys should be ashamed of yourself.  One question, did you decide on the score for each category before or after all the tests were completed? Can anyone say "custom warn score card"? The scoring behind this test is either blatant bias or incompetence.
At least you were able to throw Egno the "best value" bone.
unrealtrip
I have to completely agree with Pat, this article has got to be one of the most blatantly biased that I've seen in a long time.  Honestly I think it is embarrassing it was even published at all.  Just like said above, how is it even possible that the only two winches that actually survived are not 1st and 2nd?  Really, I expected more out of your mag, this article should be followed up with an apology over "subjective" scoring which allowed the WARN winch, which effectively failed every single test, to rank in first place.  Get real.
PatG2
Boy, was this disappointing. I've been a reader for decades and this is the first time I've felt a need to point out blatant favoritism for advertisers. No question WARN makes a great winch, but how do you justify the two winches that still work at the end of the test not being one and two? A winch that costs less than 25% of the WARN outperforms it and lives and comes in third or fourth? All I had to do was count the WARN ads in the mag to see the answer. Really sad, you've lost your credibility with me.
Four Wheeler